Hall v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
| Michael Hall |
| Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Beverly Sherman and Daniel Hester |
| 3:2020cv00071 |
| February 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Linda R Anderson |
| Henry T Wingate |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Disclosure due by 4/7/2020; Jury Trial set for 5/17/2021 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6A (Jackson) Wingate before District Judge Henry T. Wingate ; Pretrial Conference set for 4/9/2020 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6A (Jackson) Wingate before District Judge Henry T. Wingate ; Discovery due by 12/3/2020; Motions for Amended Pleadings due by 4/25/2020; Motions for Joinder of Parties due by 4/25/2020; Designate Experts Plaintiff Deadline due by 9/4/2020; Designate Experts for Defendant Deadline due by 10/5/2020; Motions due by 12/17/2020; Settlement Conference set for 11/19/2020 09:00 AM in Chambers 6.150 (Jackson) Anderson before Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson ; ADR Report due by 4/2/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 3/25/2020 (Lewis, Nijah)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson: Telephonic Case Management Conference held on 3/24/2020. Participants: Nick Norris and Amy Felder. The Court spoke with counsel. Order to be entered. (Lewis, Nijah) |
| Filing 5 Defenses and ANSWER to Complaint by Daniel Hester, Beverly Sherman, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP.(Felder, Amy) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants are hereby granted an extension of time for a period up to and through Monday, February 24, 2020, in which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint in this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 2/13/20 (Lewis, Nijah)
|
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and Defenses to Complaint by Daniel Hester, Beverly Sherman, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Email from Plaintiff's counsel agreeing to requested extension)(Felder, Amy) |
| Filing 2 Rule 16(a) Initial Order Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 3/24/2020 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson. No later than seven (7) days prior to the TCMC, a confidential memorandum AND a proposed Case Management Order shall be submitted via e-mail to anderson_chambers@mssd.uscourts.gov. Counsel for Plaintiff shall initiate the conference call; and once all parties are on the line, contact the Court at 601-608-4440.. (Lewis, Nijah) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with JURY DEMAND by Daniel Hester, Beverly Sherman, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP from Hinds County Circuit Court, MS, case number 19-778. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0538-4200855) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- All process received by Defendants, #2 Exhibit B- Contents of Hinds County Circuit Court File, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(LAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
