Rockingham v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Sharron Denise Rockingham |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| SSA General Counsel |
| 3:2020cv00094 |
| February 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| F Keith Ball |
| Daniel P Jordan |
| Social Security: HIA |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER *RESTRICTED* granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; *RESTRICTED* granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 3/16/20. (YWJ)(Copy mailed to Plaintiff at address listed on docket sheet.)
|
| Filing 4 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis in response #3 ORDER by Sharron Denise Rockingham. (KNS) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER regarding Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs #2 . Plaintiff is ordered to provide further information. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 3/2/20. (Attachments: #1 Attachment AO 239 Form)(YWJ)(Copy mailed to Plaintiff at address listed on docket sheet.)
|
| Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sharron Denise Rockingham. (KNS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration, filed by Sharron Denise Rockingham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KNS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
