Montgomery v. Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Patrick O'Neal Savontrell Montgomery
Defendant: John Does 1-10 and Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2020cv00355
Filed: May 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: F Keith Ball
Referring Judge: Carlton W Reeves
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Service of Pre-Discovery Disclosure by Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Inc. (Meehan, Donna)
July 17, 2020 Filing 5 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Inc. (Meehan, Donna)
June 3, 2020 Filing 4 Amended ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Inc..(Meehan, Donna)
May 29, 2020 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Inc..(Meehan, Donna)
May 28, 2020 Filing 2 Rule 16(a) Initial Order Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 8/7/2020 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball. No later than seven (7) days prior to the TCMC, a confidential memorandum AND a proposed Case Management Order shall be submitted via e mail to ball_chambers@mssd.uscourts.gov. Counsel for Plaintiff shall set up the conference and, once all the parties are on the line, contact the Court at 601-608-4460. (JEJ)
May 21, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with JURY DEMAND by Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Inc. from Hinds County Circuit Court, MS, case number 20-204. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 34643059548) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Complaint, #2 Exhibit B- Anazia v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company, April 23, 2020 Slip Copy, #3 Exhibit C- Proof of Service-Summons, #4 Exhibit D - State Court Pleadings #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (LAT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Montgomery v. Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Inc.
Represented By: Donna Marie Meehan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick O'Neal Savontrell Montgomery
Represented By: John Raymond Reeves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?