Eggleston v. Dollar General Corporation et al
Christine Eggleston |
John Does 1-10, Dolgencorp, LLC and Dollar General Corporation |
3:2020cv00360 |
May 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
F Keith Ball |
Daniel P Jordan |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Dolgencorp, LLC, Dollar General Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Dollar General Corporation for Dolgencorp, LLC, Dollar General Corporation. (Carlson, Mark) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with JURY DEMAND by Dolgencorp, LLC, Dollar General Corporation from Hinds County Circuit Court, Mississippi, case number 20-109. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 34643059563) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B- Plaintiff's Proof of Service, #3 Exhibit C- Plaintiff's Settlement Demand, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(LAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.