Pollard et al v. Smith-Rayford et al
Brittany Pollard and Samuel Pollard, Jr. |
Jackson HMA, LLC also known as Merit Health Central doing business as Central Mississippi Medical Center, Merit Health Central, Samuel Brown, John Does 1-10, Edith Smith-Rayford and United States of America |
3:2020cv00791 |
December 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
F Keith Ball |
Carlton W Reeves |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY pursuant to L.U.Civ.R. 16(b)(3)(B) pending a decision on the Motion to Dismiss at docket no. #7 . The telephonic case management conference set for February 18, 2021, is cancelled. No further written order shall issue from the Court. (A copy has been mailed to Pro Se Plaintiffs at 322 North Prentiss St., Jackson, MS 39209.) Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 1/29/2021. (JEJ) |
Filing 11 Rule 16(a) Initial Order Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 2/18/2021 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball. No later than seven (7) days prior to the TCMC, a confidential memorandum AND a proposed Case Management Order shall be submitted via e mail to ball_chambers@mssd.uscourts.gov. Counsel for DEFENDANTS Edith Smith-Rayford M.D., et al. shall set up the conference and, once all the parties are on the line, contact the Court at 601-608-4460. (A copy has been mailed to Pro Se Plaintiffs at 322 North Prentiss St., Jackson, MS 39209. Also, sent letter to Pro Se Plaintiffs requesting their telephone number for the docket.)(JEJ) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Jackson HMA, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Barry Moss)(Boykin, Thurman) |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Jackson HMA, LLC (Boykin, Thurman) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Samuel Brown, Edith Smith-Rayford, United States of America (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Meredith Torres)(Norwood-Federal Gov, Andrew) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Samuel Brown, Edith Smith-Rayford, United States of America (Norwood-Federal Gov, Andrew) |
Filing 6 State Court Record by Defendants Samuel Brown, Edith Smith-Rayford, United States of America Volumes 1 (Norwood-Federal Gov, Andrew) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen P. Kruger on behalf of Jackson HMA, LLC (Kruger, Stephen) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Thurman L. Boykin, III on behalf of Jackson HMA, LLC (Boykin, Thurman) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Substutition by Samuel Brown, Edith Smith-Rayford (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification of U.S. Attorney)(Norwood-Federal Gov, Andrew) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Mitzi Dease Paige-Federal Gov on behalf of Samuel Brown, Edith Smith-Rayford (Paige-Federal Gov, Mitzi) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Samuel Brown, Jackson HMA, LLC, Edith Smith-Rayford from Hinds County Circuit Court, MS, case number 25CI1:20-cv-351-AHW. If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(LAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.