Doyle v. Cinemark USA, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Donald Doyle
Defendant: Cinemark USA, Inc. and John Doe Entities A - M
Case Number: 3:2020cv00793
Filed: December 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Linda R Anderson
Referring Judge: LaKeysha Greer Isaac
2 Judge: Carlton W Reeves
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2021 Filing 8 Rule 16(a) Initial Order Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 3/3/2021 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge LaKeysha Greer Isaac. No later than seven (7) days prior to the TCMC, a confidential memorandum AND a proposed Case Management Order shall be submitted via e-mail to isaac_chambers@mssd.uscourts.gov. Counsel for Plaintiff shall initiate the conference call; and once all parties are on the line, contact the Court at 601-608-4440. (Lewis, Nijah)
January 27, 2021 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cinemark USA, Inc. (Huffman, Nicole)
January 27, 2021 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Cinemark USA, Inc..(Huffman, Nicole)
January 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge LaKeysha Greer Isaac for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson no longer assigned to case Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 1/5/21 (MGB)
January 5, 2021 Parties should include the case number new Judge assignment of 3:20cv793CWR-LGI on future filings. (MGB)
December 28, 2020 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Cinemark USA, Inc. answer due 2/5/2021. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 12/28/20 (Lewis, Nijah)
December 23, 2020 Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Cinemark USA, Inc. (Huffman, Nicole)
December 21, 2020 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Donald Doyle. Cinemark USA, Inc. served on 12/15/2020, answer due 1/5/2021. (Kilpatrick, Jay)
December 10, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Cinemark USA, Inc.. (PG)
December 10, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cinemark USA, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 34643061722), filed by Donald Doyle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(PG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doyle v. Cinemark USA, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cinemark USA, Inc.
Represented By: Nicole C. Huffman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe Entities A - M
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald Doyle
Represented By: Jay Max Kilpatrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?