Heritage Real Estate Investment, Inc.
| United States Trustee and U.S. Bankruptcy Court-Jackson |
| Stephen Smith |
| Heritage Real Estate Investment, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00003 |
| January 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| LaKeysha Greer Isaac |
| Carlton W Reeves |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1334 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge LaKeysha Greer Isaac for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson no longer assigned to case Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 1/5/21 (NEF's and Copies mailed to Plaintiff)(MGB)
|
| Filing 1 Amended Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 14-03603-NPO. File received The docketing of the record on appeal by USDC starts the briefing schedule. Attorneys should refer to Bankruptcy Rule 8018 for all briefing schedules., filed by Heritage Real Estate Investment, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Notice of Appeal Dkt #569, #2 Attachment Clerks Notice of Filing Notice of Appeal, #3 Attachment Transmittal Letter, #4 Attachment Docket Sheet)(PG) |
| Parties should include the case number new Judge assignment of 3:21cv003CWR-LGI on future filings. (MGB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
