Grigsby v. Sanders et al
| William John Grigsby |
| Emily Sanders, Unknown Does 1 Through 5, Tenia Hill, Ashley White-Timmons, Ashley Sanders, Sheifert Holdings, LLC doing business as MetroCenter Jackson and Merrick Sanders |
| 3:2021cv00043 |
| January 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| F Keith Ball |
| Daniel P Jordan |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Emily Sanders served on 1/25/2021, answer due 2/16/2021. (cwl) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Ashley Sanders served on 1/25/2021, answer due 2/16/2021; Sheifert Holdings, LLC served on 1/25/2021, answer due 2/16/2021. (cwl) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed Emily Sanders served on 1/21/2021, answer due 2/11/2021. (cwl) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed Merrick Sanders served on 1/25/2021, answer due 2/16/2021. (cwl) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting Defendants' #3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. Defendants' motion #3 for an additional 30 days to file an answer to Plaintiff's Complaint #1 is granted, as it has not been opposed. The docket, however, does not indicate the date on which service of process was completed as to each Defendant. Therefore, the Court, sua sponte, hereby orders Plaintiff to file on or before 3/24/2021 proof of service of process upon each Defendant or proof of each Defendant's waiver or acceptance of services of process. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 3/17/2021 (dcw)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER WITHDRAWING GRANT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION #3 FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER AND DEFFERING RULING ON SAID MOTION #3 . The full time allotted for Plaintiff's response has not yet expired pursuant to L.U. Civ. R. 7(b)(4) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d). NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 3/12/2021. (dcw)
|
|
***ERROR***DISREGARD***ERROR***TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting Defendants' #3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. Defendants' motion #3 for an additional 30 days to file an answer to Plaintiff's Complaint #1 is granted, as it has not been opposed. The docket, however, does not indicate the date on which service of process was completed as to each Defendant. Therefore, the Court, sua sponte, hereby orders Plaintiff to file on or before 3/19/2021 proof of service of process upon each Defendant or proof of each Defendant's waiver or acceptance of services of process. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 3/12/2021. (dcw) Modified on 3/12/2021 (dcw).
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, and/or Responsive Pleading by Tenia Hill, Ashley Sanders, Emily Sanders, Merrick Sanders, Sheifert Holdings, LLC, Ashley White-Timmons (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Email from Mike Farrell - dated 2-4-2021, #2 Exhibit B - Email from Mike Farrell - dated 2-23-21)(Stamps, Larry) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ashley Sanders, Emily Sanders, Merrick Sanders, Sheifert Holdings, LLC. (PG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND DAMAGES , against Tenia Hill, Ashley Sanders, Emily Sanders, Merrick Sanders, Sheifert Holdings, LLC, Ashley White-Timmons ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 34643062145), filed by William John Grigsby. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(PG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
