Copeland-Robinson v. Vantec Hitachi Transport System (USA) Inc. et al
Phalandra Copeland-Robinson |
John Does 1-10 and Vantec Hitachi Transport System (USA) Inc. |
3:2021cv00214 |
March 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
LaKeysha Greer Isaac |
Carlton W Reeves |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Rule 16(a) Initial Order Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 6/23/2021 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge LaKeysha Greer Isaac. No later than seven (7) days prior to the TCMC, a confidential memorandum AND a proposed Case Management Order shall be submitted via e-mail to isaac_chambers@mssd.uscourts.gov. The parties are instructed to use the following dial-in number for the conference call. Dial-in #:(888) 684-8852; Passcode: 3566012(Lewis, Nijah) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Vantec Hitachi Transport System (USA) Inc. (Cannon, Jeffrey) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Vantec Hitachi Transport System (USA) Inc..(Cannon, Jeffrey) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Vantec Hitachi Transport System (USA) Inc. (KNS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Does 1-10, Vantec Hitachi Transport System (USA) Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 34643062894), filed by Phalandra Copeland-Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KNS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.