Hoard v. Vance
Derrick Dorez Hoard |
Lee D. Vance |
Pro Se Department |
3:2021cv00363 |
May 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Tom S Lee |
Michael T Parker |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 *RESTRICTED* State Court Record - Habeas by Defendant Lee D. Vance (Attachments: #1 State Court Record (SCR), Cause No. 2021-M-00242)(Owens-State Gov, Jerrolyn) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Lee D. Vance (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Docket of Hinds County Circuit Court in State v. Hoard, Cause No. 25CI1:16-cr-00491), #2 Exhibit B (Indictment and Capias), #3 Exhibit C (Motion for Discovery), #4 Exhibit D (Pro Se Letter), #5 Exhibit E (Order Appointing Counsel), #6 Exhibit F (Order of Arraignment and Trial Setting), #7 Exhibit G (Agreed Order Granting Continuance - Oct 2016), #8 Exhibit H (Motion to Compel Production of Evidence), #9 Exhibit I (Agreed Order Granting Continuance - Dec 2016), #10 Exhibit J (Agreed Order Granting Continuance - Apr 2017), #11 Exhibit K (Agreed Order Granting Continuance - June 2017), #12 Exhibit L (Motions to Compel Production of Evidence), #13 Exhibit M (Amended Order Setting Deadlines and Trial Date - Apr 2018), #14 Exhibit N (Amended Order Setting Deadlines and Trial Date - July 2018), #15 Exhibit O (Motion for Competency Evaluation and Continuance), #16 Exhibit P (Amended Order Setting Deadlines and Trial Date - Jan 2019), #17 Exhibit Q (Agreed Order Granting Continuance - July 2019), #18 Exhibit R (Amended Order Setting Deadlines and Trial Date - July 2019), #19 Exhibit S (Pro Se letter to court for information), #20 Exhibit R (Agreed Order Granting Continuance - Oct 2019), #21 Exhibit U (Amended Order Setting Deadlines and Trial Date - Oct 2019), #22 Exhibit V (Motion to Compel Discovery), #23 Exhibit W (Amended Order Setting Deadlines and Trial Date - June 2020), #24 Exhibit X (Amended Order Setting Deadlines and Trial Date - June 2020), #25 Exhibit Y (Motion to Compel Discovery), #26 Exhibit Z (Order granting motion for records of decedent), #27 Exhibit AA (Order for payment of fees), #28 Exhibit BB (Order of Continuance), #29 Exhibit CC (Pro Se Motion to Dismiss Charges), #30 Exhibit DD (Amended Order Setting Deadlines and Trial Date - Dec 2020), #31 Exhibit EE (Pro Se Notice of Oncoming Writ of Habeas Corpus), #32 Exhibit FF (Motion to Withdraw), #33 Exhibit GG (Order Granting Motion to Withdraw), #34 Exhibit HH (Order Appointing Counsel), #35 Exhibit II (Defendant's Request for Discovery and Motion for Hearing), #36 Exhibit JJ (Amended Order Setting Deadlines and Trial Date - May 2020))(Owens-State Gov, Jerrolyn) |
Filing 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Lee D. Vance served on 6/9/2021, answer due 6/29/2021. (cwl) |
Filing 2 ORDER, Respondent Vance, through the Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, file an answer or other responsive pleading in this cause within twenty (20) days of the service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 6/7/2021. (LDR) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number 34643063531.), filed by Derrick Dorez Hoard. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Order, #2 Exhibit B - Docket Sheet, #3 Notice of Assignment, #4 Envelope)(PG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.