Wallace v. Mills
| Antonio Daniel Wallace |
| Supt. Andrew Mills |
| Pro Se Department |
| 3:2021cv00364 |
| May 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Kristi H Johnson |
| Michael T Parker |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE (Unsigned) to #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Antonio Daniel Wallace. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KNS) |
| Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #10 Response to Motion, #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Andrew Mills (Grant-State Gov, Bridgette) |
| Filing 11 Change of Address filed by Antonio Daniel Wallace: to Unit 10, A-Zone, 28. No change of location. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KNS) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Antonio Daniel Wallace. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KNS) |
| Filing 9 *RESTRICTED* State Court Record - Habeas by Defendant Andrew Mills Volumes 10 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2013-KA-1181, Clerk Papers Vol. 1, #2 Exhibit 2013-KA-1181, Transcript Vol. 2, #3 Exhibit 2013-KA-1181, Transcript Vol. 3, #4 Exhibit 2013-KA-1181, Transcript Vol. 4, #5 Exhibit 2013-KA-1181, Transcript Vol. 5, #6 Exhibit 2013-KA-1181, Case Folder, #7 Exhibit 2013-KA-1181, Briefs of the Parties, #8 Exhibit 2013-KA-1181, Exhibits, #9 Exhibit 2013-CT-1181, Cert Folder, #10 Exhibit 2019-M-1279, Misc. Case Folder)(Grant-State Gov, Bridgette) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by Andrew Mills (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Judgment of Conviction, #2 Exhibit B - Sentencing Order, #3 Exhibit C - Wallace v. State (Miss. Ct. App. 2014), #4 Exhibit D - Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part PCR - Remanding Kidnapping, #5 Exhibit E - Resentencing Order Ct. II, #6 Exhibit F - Order Denying 2nd PCR)(Grant-State Gov, Bridgette) |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed by Lynn Fitch, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, as to Andrew Mills served on 6/17/2021, answer due 7/7/2021. (KNS) |
Filing 6
ORDER, Respondent Andrew Mills, through Lynn Fitch, shall file an answer or other responsive pleading in this cause within twenty (20) days of the service upon Lynn Fitch. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 6/14/2021. (LDR)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER *RESTRICTED* finding as moot #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Kristi H. Johnson on 06/09/2021 (KK)
|
| Filing fee paid: $ 5.00, receipt number 34643063657. (KNS) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: on or before 6/25/2021, plaintiff shall either pay the required filing fee or file a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, specifically the section entitled Certificate to Be Completed by Authorized Officer of prisoner accounts or file an affidavit specifically stating the name of the prison official contacted concerning the Certificate and why this information is not provided to this court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 05/26/2021. (CS)
|
| Filing 3 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Antonio Daniel Wallace. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(KNS) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Antonio Daniel Wallace. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(KNS) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Antonio Daniel Wallace. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope, #3 Notice of Assignment)(KNS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
