Graham v. Sollie et al
| Shalan Montreze Graham |
| Billy Sollie and The State of Mississippi |
| Pro Se Department |
| 3:2021cv00379 |
| June 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| F Keith Ball |
| Daniel P Jordan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed by Attorney General as to Billy Sollie served on 7/19/2021, answer due 8/9/2021. (VM) |
Filing 4
ORDER, State of Mississippi is hereby removed as a Respondent in this case. Respondent Sheriff Billy Sollie, through Lynn Fitch, shall file an answer or other responsive pleading in this cause within twenty (20) days of the service upon the said Lynn Fitch of a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 07/02/2021. (CS)
|
| Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 34643063839. (VM) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER *RESTRICTED* denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis as set out in the Order. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on June 10, 2021. (SP)
|
| Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Shalan Montreze Graham. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(VM) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Shalan Montreze Graham. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope, #3 Notice of Assignment)(VM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
