Eichelberger v. Estate of James Harris et al
| J. Matthew Eichelberger |
| Estate of James Harris, M. Judith Barnett, John Waddel, Estate of Darwin Maples and John Does 1-10 |
| 3:2021cv00607 |
| September 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| F Keith Ball |
| Daniel P Jordan |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Estate of James Harris (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Diaz, Oliver) |
| Filing 8 Response in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by J. Matthew Eichelberger (Eichelberger, Jonathan) filed by Estate of James Harris (Diaz, Oliver) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #9 : L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(2) requires that all supporting exhibits to a document be denominated by an exhibit letter or number and a meaningful description. Attorney is advised to follow this rule in future filings. (KNS) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY except for remand-related discovery pending a ruling by the district judge on the Motion to Remand, at docket no. #6 . The telephonic case management conference set for October 26, 2021, is cancelled. No further written order shall issue from the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 10/20/2021. (JEJ)
|
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by J. Matthew Eichelberger (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Join Necessary Parties, #2 Exhibit Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Join Necessary Parties)(Eichelberger, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by J. Matthew Eichelberger (Eichelberger, Jonathan) |
| Filing 5 Rule 16(a) Initial Order Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 10/26/2021 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball. No later than seven (7) days prior to the TCMC, a confidential memorandum AND a proposed Case Management Order shall be submitted via e mail to ball_chambers@mssd.uscourts.gov. Counsel for Plaintiff shall set up the conference and, once all the parties are on the line, contact the Court at 601-608-4460. (JEJ) |
| Filing 4 State Court Record by Defendant Estate of James Harris (Carner, Graham) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Judith Barnett on behalf of M. Judith Barnett (Barnett, Mary) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Estate of James Harris.(Carner, Graham) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #2 : Attorney is directed to include judges' initials in case number in future filings, 3:21-cv-00607-DPJ-FKB. (KNS) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Estate of James Harris from Chancery Court of Hinds County, Mississippi, case number 20-1162. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 34643064758) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Summons and Petition, #3 Exhibit 3 - Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(VM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
