Keyes et al v. Mississippi Department of Public Safety et al
| Melissa Keyes and Christopher Keyes |
| Mississippi Department of Public Safety, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Jay Frank Clark, Jr. and John Does 1-X |
| 3:2021cv00646 |
| October 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Tom S Lee |
| Michael T Parker |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF Receipt by Hon Zack Wallace re #20 Letter to Zack Wallace, Clerk, transmitting certified copies of Order to Remand and Docket Sheet. (CO) (Main Document 21 replaced with filed stamped copy on 12/29/2021) (CO). Modified on 12/29/2021 (CO). |
| Filing 20 Letter to Zack Wallace, Clerk, transmitting certified copies of Order to Remand and Docket Sheet. (CO) |
Filing 19
ORDER: IT is ordered that Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand is GRANTED and that Defendant State Farm's Motion to Sever and Partially Remand is DENIED. This case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Hinds County, Mississippi. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 12/13/2021 (CO) Modified on 12/14/2021 (CO).
|
| Filing 18 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #17 MOTION to Sever and Partially Remand, #16 Response in Opposition to Motion to Remand filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Moore, Michael) |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Sever and Partially Remand by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Williams v. Adams Order, #2 Exhibit Mims v. Bond Order, #3 Exhibit Byrd v. SafeCo Order, #4 Exhibit Haynes v. State Farm Order, #5 Exhibit Houston v. Rigdon Order, #6 Exhibit Harris v. Smith Order, #7 Exhibit Kelly v. Ferguson Order, #8 Exhibit Murrell v. Herrington Order, #9 Exhibit Brown v. Smith Order, #10 Exhibit Spells v. Townsend Order, #11 Exhibit Buie v. Anderson Order, #12 Exhibit Jenkins v. Powell Order, #13 Exhibit Patrick v. Donald Order, #14 Exhibit McGuire v. McElroy Order, #15 Exhibit Edwards v. Wylie Order, #16 Exhibit Keyes Policies)(Moore, Michael) |
| Filing 16 Response in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Remand by Christopher Keyes, Melissa Keyes (Carr, Elizabeth) filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Moore, Michael) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint by Jay Frank Clark, Jr.(Alexander, Amanda) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint by Mississippi Department of Public Safety.(Alexander, Amanda) |
| Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and/or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Jay Frank Clark, Jr (Alexander, Amanda) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda Green Alexander on behalf of Jay Frank Clark, Jr (Alexander, Amanda) |
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #13 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Jay Frank Clark, Jr answer due 11/1/2021. No further written order will issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on October 21, 2021 (KPM)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER staying discovery and disclosure requirements pending a ruling on the motion to remand. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on October 18, 2021 (KPM)
|
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Mississippi Department of Public Safety answer due 11/1/2021. No further written order will issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on October 18, 2021 (KPM)
|
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION to Remand filed by Christopher Keyes, Melissa Keyes (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Carr, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Remand by Christopher Keyes, Melissa Keyes (Carr, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Melissa Keyes, Christopher Keyes. Jay Frank Clark, Jr served on 9/24/2021, answer due 10/15/2021. (Carr, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth R. Carr on behalf of Christopher Keyes, Melissa Keyes (Carr, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Mississippi Department of Public Safety (Alexander, Amanda) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael R. Moore on behalf of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Moore, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Calen J. Wills on behalf of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Wills, Calen) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Banahan, John) |
| Filing 2 State Court Record by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Banahan, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company from Circuit Court of Hinds County, Mississippi, case number 25CI1:21-cv-502-TTG. ( Filing fee $ 402 paid; receipt number AMSSDC-4678115 ) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Uniform Crash Report, #3 Exhibit C - Photographs, #4 Exhibit D - McGuire Decision, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(ND) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
