Woodard v. Flowood Mac Haik CKJR LTD
| Anthony Woodard |
| Flowood Mac Haik CDJR LTD |
| 3:2021cv00654 |
| October 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| F Keith Ball |
| Carlton W Reeves |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY pursuant to L.U.Civ.R. 16(b)(3)(B) pending a decision on the Motion to Compel Arbitration & Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Stay Proceedings at docket no. #6 . No further written order shall issue from the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 12/7/2021. (JEJ)
|
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #6 : This document requests several motion reliefs. Every motion relief should be selected from the list of motion titles or each relief docketed separately. The same PDF document may be used for all motion filing entries. It is not necessary to refile as court staff has made the necessary correction. Attorney is advised to follow this procedure in future filings. (KNS) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration & Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Stay Proceedings filed by Flowood Mac Haik CDJR LTD (Welch, Chadwick) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration & Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Stay Proceedings by Flowood Mac Haik CDJR LTD (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Declaration of Stacy Brown)(Welch, Chadwick). Added MOTION to Stay Proceedings on 12/7/2021 (KNS). |
|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for defendant's response to plaintiff's complaint is extended. Defendant is directed to file his response on or before December 3, 2021. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 11/23/2021. (HAH)
|
| Filing 5 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Flowood Mac Haik CDJR LTD (Welch, Chadwick) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anthony Woodard. Flowood Mac Haik CDJR LTD served on 11/3/2021, answer due 11/24/2021. (Watson, Louis) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Nicholas Norris on behalf of Anthony Woodard (Norris, Robert) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Flowood Mac Haik CDJR LTD. (VM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Flowood Mac Haik CDJR LTD (Filing fee $402 receipt number AMSSDC-4681554), filed by Anthony Woodard. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit B-EEOC RTS, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(VM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woodard v. Flowood Mac Haik CKJR LTD | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anthony Woodard | |
| Represented By: | Louis H. Watson, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Robert Nicholas Norris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Flowood Mac Haik CDJR LTD | |
| Represented By: | Chadwick M. Welch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
