Brown v. Savell
Nicholas D. Brown |
Hon. Charles Savell |
Pro Se Department |
3:2022cv00084 |
February 17, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Daniel P Jordan |
Robert P Myers |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, on or before April 21, 2022, pro se Petitioner Nicholas D. Brown shall either pay the $5 filing fee, apply for leave to proceed ifp, or file a written response showing cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to obey an Order #3 of the Court. Show Cause Response due by 4/21/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr. on 04/07/2022. (CS) |
Filing 5 Amended Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Nicholas D. Brown. Related document: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Plaintiff Nicholas D. Brown. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(KNS) |
Filing 4 Letter from Plaintiff. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (KNS) |
Filing 3 ORDER: on or before 3/24/2022, petitioner shall complete and file the attached application or pay the $5.00 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr on 2/22/2022. (LDR) |
Filing 2 Letter from Plaintiff. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (KNS) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Nicholas D. Brown. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Notice of Assignment)(KNS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.