Spears v. Huffman
| Marion Chad Spears |
| Superintendent Brad Huffman and Superintendent Brand Huffman |
| Pro Se Department |
| 3:2022cv00201 |
| April 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Tom S Lee |
| Robert H Walker |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Marion Chad Spears. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(LAT) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing by Marion Chad Spears. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(LAT) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Intent by Marion Chad Spears. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(LAT) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Marion Chad Spears. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(LAT) |
| Filing 7 *RESTRICTED* State Court Record - Habeas by Defendant Brand Huffman (Attachments: #1 State Court Record (SCR), Cause No. 2010-KA-2059, Vol. 1, #2 SCR, Cause No. 2010-KA-2059, Vol. 2, #3 SCR, Cause No. 2010-KA-2059, Vol. 3, #4 SCR, Cause No. 2010-KA-2059, Case Folder, #5 SCR, Cause No. 2010-KA-2059, Briefs of the Parties, #6 SCR, 2016-M-903)(Owens-State Gov, Jerrolyn) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Brand Huffman (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Verdict and Sentencing Order), #2 Exhibit B (Per Curiam Affirmance and Mandate), #3 Exhibit C (Application for Post-Conviction Relief filed June 24, 2016), #4 Exhibit D (Order of Miss. Supreme Court dismissing post-conviction filed August 24, 2016), #5 Exhibit E (Application for Post-Conviction Relief filed August 9, 2021), #6 Exhibit F (Order of Miss. Supreme Court denying post-conviction filed September 27, 2021), #7 Exhibit G (Order of Miss. Supreme Court filed November 10, 2021 dismissing Motion to Amend), #8 Exhibit H (Application for Post-Conviction Relief filed January 31, 2022), #9 Exhibit I (Order of Miss. Supreme Court denying post-conviction filed March 3, 2022), #10 Exhibit J (Order of Miss. Supreme Court filed March 29, 2022 dismissing Motion to Amend)(Owens-State Gov, Jerrolyn) |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Brand Huffman (Lynn Fitch) served on 5/10/2022, answer due 5/31/2022. (LAT) |
Filing 4
ORDER, the Clerk is directed to edit the docket to reflect the correct spelling of Respondent's name which is Superintendent Brand Huffman. The Respondent, through Honorable Lynn Fitch, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, is required to file an answer or other responsive pleading in this cause within 20 days of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker on 5/4/2022. (LDR)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER *RESTRICTED* granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker on 5/4/2022. (LDR)
|
| Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marion Chad Spears. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LAT) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Marion Chad Spears. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Supporting Documents, #2 Exhibit A- State of Mississippi Neshoba County Indictment, #3 Exhibit B- Neshoba County Circuit Court Judgment, #4 Exhibit B- Supreme Court of Mississippi Order, #5 Exhibit C- Neshoba County Circuit Court Jury Instruction, #6 Cover Letter, #7 Envelope, #8 Notice of Assignment)(LAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
