Elliot v. Warden A. Thomas, III
Mark Edward Elliot |
Warden A. Thomas, III |
Pro Se Department |
3:2022cv00226 |
April 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
F Keith Ball |
Carlton W Reeves |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER, on or before July 8, 2022, Elliot shall complete, sign and file a form "Petition For A Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241" (Form AO-242). Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 06/08/2022. (Attachments: #1 AO 242 form) (CS) |
Filing 2 ORDER SEVERING CLAIMS BROUGHT UNDER THE FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT: IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, for the reasons stated above, Petitioner Elliots claims brought under the FTCA are SEVERED. The Clerk of Court is directed to open a new and separate civil action for Elliot under the FTCA and therein file a copy of Elliots Petition #1 along with a copy of this Order. Elliots Petition #1 to the extent it seeks a Writ of Habeas Corpus remains pending before the Court in this civil action. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 6/7/2022 (LAT) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Mark Edward Elliot. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Notice of Assignment, #3 Envelope)(CO) |
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 252. Copy of NEF mailed to plaintiff. (CO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.