Stinson v. Newk's Franchise Company, LLC et al
| Scott Stinson |
| Newk's Franchise Company, LLC and John Doe Business 1-5 |
| 3:2022cv00290 |
| May 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Tom S Lee |
| Michael T Parker |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Service of Defendant's Initial Disclosure by Newk's Franchise Company, LLC (Johnson, William) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Service of Defendant's First Set of Request for Production by Newk's Franchise Company, LLC (Johnson, William) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Service of Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories by Newk's Franchise Company, LLC (Johnson, William) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #3 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Scott Stinson.(Waide, Daniel) |
| Filing 11 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 8/11/2022 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker. Counsel shall dial 1.888.273.3658, code 1055457 to connect to the call. Confidential settlement memoranda are due on or before 8/4/22. (KPM) |
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE UPON CONSENT. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker for all further proceedings. District Judge Tom S. Lee no longer assigned to case. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 6/14/2022 (LAT)
|
| Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Newk's Franchise Company, LLC, Scott Stinson. (LAT) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Withdraw #6 Joint MOTION to Withdraw #4 MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration MOTION to Compel Reclassify as a Non-Jury Trial, and Consent to Trial before the Magistrate Judge. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 6/14/2022 (LAT)
|
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Newk's Franchise Company, LLC (Johnson, William) |
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION to Withdraw #4 MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration MOTION to Compel Reclassify as a Non-Jury Trial, and Consent to Trial before the Magistrate Judge by Newk's Franchise Company, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent to Magistrate Judge)(Johnson, William) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration filed by Newk's Franchise Company, LLC (Johnson, William) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration by Newk's Franchise Company, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Declaration of Amy McIntosh)(Johnson, William). Added MOTION to Compel on 6/9/2022 (ND). |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Scott Stinson by Newk's Franchise Company, LLC.(Johnson, William) |
| Filing 2 State Court Record by Defendant Newk's Franchise Company, LLC Volumes 1 (Johnson, William) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Newk's Franchise Company, LLC from Hinds County Circuit Court, case number 25CI1:22-cv-170-AHW. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMSSDC-4849719) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - State Court Pleadings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(LAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
