Rogers v. Pittsburg Bottom Line Co. LLC et al
Ashley Rogers |
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Pittsburg Bottom Line Co. LLC doing business as Bottom Line Company, Pittsburg Bottom Line LLC, Bottom Line Company, Other Unknown Entities 1-10 and John and Jane Does 1-10 |
3:2022cv00366 |
June 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
F Keith Ball |
Carlton W Reeves |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Pittsburg Bottom Line Co. LLC, from Circuit Court of Rankin County, Mississippi, case number 61CI1:22-cv-155-JA. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMSSDC-4873094) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Docket, #2 Exhibit B - State Court File, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(CO) Modified on 6/30/2022 to correct filers. (CO). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.