Harris v. Oak Truck Lines, LLC et al
| Eric Harris |
| Oak Truck Lines, LLC, John Does Persons A-M and John Doe Entities N-Z |
| 3:2022cv00438 |
| August 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| F Keith Ball |
| Daniel P Jordan |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Service of First Set of Request for Production by Oak Truck Lines, LLC (Dunbar, David) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Service of First Set of Interrogatories by Oak Truck Lines, LLC (Dunbar, David) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Service of Initial Disclosure by Eric Harris (Philley, Benjamin) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Service of Initial Disclosure by Oak Truck Lines, LLC (Dunbar, David) |
| Filing 7 Rule 16(a) Initial Order Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 10/12/2022 09:15 AM before Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball. No later than seven (7) days prior to the TCMC, a confidential memorandum AND a proposed Case Management Order shall be submitted via e mail to ball_chambers@mssd.uscourts.gov. Counsel for Plaintiff shall set up the conference and, once all the parties are on the line, contact the Court at 601-608-4460. (JEJ) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. As set out in the Order, Plaintiff's claims for direct negligence against Oak Truck Lines, LLC contained in Count 2 of Plaintiff's Complaint are moot as a matter of law and are therefore dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's claims for punitive damages contained in Sections IV and VI of Plaintiff's Complaint are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's remaining allegations against Oak Truck Lines, LLC on the basis of vicarious liability contained in Count 1 and any vicarious-liability claims referenced in Count 2 of Plaintiff's Complaint are not dismissed and shall continue. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on August 10, 2022. (SP)
|
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Oak Truck Lines, LLC (Dunbar, David) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM in Support re #3 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Certain Claims filed by Oak Truck Lines, LLC (Dunbar, David) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Certain Claims by Oak Truck Lines, LLC (Dunbar, David) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher G. Dunnells on behalf of Oak Truck Lines, LLC (Dunnells, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Oak Truck Lines, LLC from Hinds County Circuit Court, case number 25CI1:22-cv-336-TTG. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMSSDC-4896695) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #2 Exhibit B - Oak Truck Lines, LLC Secretary of State Filing, #3 Exhibit C - Oak Truck Lines, LLC's First Requests for Admission to Plaintiff, #4 Exhibit D - Email Exchange, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(PG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
