Simmons v. Transforce Inc
| Shuntwon Keeshun Simmons |
| Transforce Inc |
| 3:2022cv00466 |
| August 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Tom S Lee |
| Robert P Myers |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Transforce Inc re #10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead (Hodges, Melissa)
|
|
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #10 : Certificate of Service must be filed with the court with pro se plaintiff's address listed as means of notification of filing this document. Attorney is directed to file Certificate of Service, which is located under Service of Process. (LAT)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead re #1 COMPLAINT by Transforce Inc (Hodges, Melissa) Modified on 10/7/2022 (LAT).
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Shuntwon Keeshun Simmons. Transforce Inc. served on 9/16/2022, answer due 10/7/2022. (CO)
|
|
Filing 8
Summons Issued as to Transforce Inc. (CO)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE BY U.S. MARSHAL - The United States Marshal shall serve a copy of this order, complaint, including supporting materials, and amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) and is directed to file the return by October 14, 2022. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 09/14/2022 (CO)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER *RESTRICTED* granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 09/14/2022 (CO)
|
|
Filing 5
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Transforce Inc., filed by Shuntwon Keeshun Simmons.(CO)
|
|
Filing 4
Response to Order re #3 ORDER requiring plaintiff to provide additional financial information and file an amended complaint on or before September 1, 2022 filed by Shuntwon Keeshun Simmons. (CO)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER requiring plaintiff to provide additional financial information and file an amended complaint on or before September 1, 2022. Failure to timely respond as ordered by the court will result in dismissal of his complaint without further notice from the court. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on August 17, 2022 (DCL)
|
|
Filing 2
*RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Shuntwon Keeshun Simmons. (PG)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Transforce Inc, filed by Shuntwon Keeshun Simmons. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(PG) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/11/2022: #3 Notice of Assignment) (PG).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Simmons v. Transforce Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shuntwon Keeshun Simmons | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Transforce Inc | |
| Represented By: | Melissa Kimberly Hodges |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
