Boone et al v. Bey
| Steven Boone, William Purdie, Phil Fisher, Ford Hayman, Amanda Clark, Jordan Lewis and Aaron Griffin |
| Richard Amun'Ra Bey |
| 3:2022cv00474 |
| August 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| F Keith Ball |
| Daniel P Jordan |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT re #13 Order by Richard Amun'Ra Bey. (KNS) |
| Filing 14 Letter from Arthur Johnston, Clerk to Municipal Court Clerk, City of Clinton, MS transmitting certified copies of Order of Remand and Docket Sheet. (KNS) |
Filing 13
ORDER OF REMAND. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 09/21/2022 (KNS)
|
| Filing 12 Averment of Jurisdiction from Defendant. (KNS) |
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT by Richard Amun'Ra Bey. (KNS) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT by Richard Amun'Ra Bey. (KNS) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT re #1 Notice of Removal, by Richard Amun'Ra Bey. (KNS) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT re #1 Notice of Removal, by Richard Amun'Ra Bey. (KNS) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT re #1 Notice of Removal, by Richard Amun'Ra Bey. (KNS) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: For the reasons set out in the Order, Defendant's response is due September 15, 2022. Failure to respond will result in remand of this action. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on September 1, 2022. (SP)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark David Morrison on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Morrison, Mark) |
| Filing 4 ATTACHMENT - Averment of Jurisdiction re #1 Notice of Removal by Richard Amun'Ra Bey. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Fact, #2 *Exhibit AA) *page 11 was not submitted. (KNS) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #3 : Entry has been stricken per TOO of 08/16/2022. (KNS) |
|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER striking the summonses #3 directed to Plaintiffs Steven Boone, Amanda Clark, Phil Fisher, Aaron Griffin, Ford Hayman, Jordan Lewis, and William Purdie. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(a)(1)(B) and 4(b), a summons must be directed to the defendant and issued for service on the defendant. As Bey is the sole defendant in this case and requested summonses #3 directed and issued for service on the named Plaintiffs in this action, the summonses #3 were issued in error and are hereby stricken. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 8/16/2022. (dcw)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER *RESTRICTED* denying as moot Defendant Bey's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, as Bey has paid the filing fee. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 8/16/2022. (dcw)
|
| Filing 3 ***STRIKE THIS ENTRY***DISREGARD THIS ENTRY***Issued Summonses. (KNS) Modified on 8/16/2022 (KNS). |
| Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Richard Amun'Ra Bey. (KNS) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Richard Amun'Ra Bey ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 1433) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 SC, #2 Exhibit 2 SC, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(KNS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
