Davis v. McCarthy et al
Plaintiff: Eddie James Davis, Jr.
Defendant: Major Unknown McCarthy and Keith Reed
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Case Number: 3:2022cv00523
Filed: September 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: F Keith Ball
Referring Judge: Daniel P Jordan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Response to Order re #6 ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE A RESPONSE, response due on or before November 10, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 10/26/2022 (cwl) filed by Eddie James Davis, Jr (Attachments: #1 Supplement Order - 10/26/2022, #2 Envelope)(cwl)
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE A RESPONSE, response due on or before November 10, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 10/26/2022 (cwl)
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER *RESTRICTED* granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; *RESTRICTED* granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 10/26/2022 (cwl)
October 17, 2022 Filing 4 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eddie James Davis, Jr (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cwl)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: on or before 10/3/2022, plaintiff shall either pay the required filing fee or file a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, specifically the section entitled Certificate to Be Completed by Authorized Officer of prisoner accounts or file an affidavit specifically stating the name of the prison official contacted concerning the Certificate and why this information is not provided to this court. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 9/13/2022 (cwl)
September 12, 2022 Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eddie James Davis, Jr (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cwl)
September 12, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Eddie James Davis, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Notice of Assignment )(cwl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. McCarthy et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eddie James Davis, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Major Unknown McCarthy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keith Reed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Pro Se Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?