Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Timmy Lane Johnson |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA General Counsel |
3:2022cv00532 |
September 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Daniel P Jordan |
Bradley W Rath |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed in Social Security Case by Timmy Lane Johnson. Commissioner of Social Security served on 10/7/2022, answer due 1/5/2023. Service made upon: U S Attorney; U S Attorney General; Commissioner of SSA. (Merritt, Hannalore) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (ND) |
Filing 4 ORDER requiring answer and briefing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 9/20/22 (TS) |
Filing 3 ORDER *RESTRICTED* granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 9/20/22 (TS) |
Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Timmy Lane Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LAT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Timmy Lane Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(LAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.