Walker v. United States of America
| Darryl Walker |
| United States of America |
| Pro Se Department |
| 3:2022cv00575 |
| September 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| F Keith Ball |
| Daniel P Jordan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER - Ordered that Petitioner is directed to place his signature on page 10 of the Petition and return the signed Petition to this Court on or before November 23, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 11/4/2022 (CO)
|
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (UNSIGNED) - Response to Order re #2 ORDER, filed by Darryl Walker. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CO) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER. That the Clerk mail to Petitioner a form used to file a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241 along with a copy of this order.That Petitioner on or before November 9, 2022, is to complete the enclosed form to file a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 10/21/2022 (PG)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 1995), filed by Darryl Walker. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Notice of Assignment, #3 Envelope)(CO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
