Harris v. Lowe's et al
| Carolyn Ann Harris |
| Lowe's doing business as Lowe's Home Center, Inc. and John Does I-V |
| 3:2022cv00597 |
| October 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| F Keith Ball |
| Daniel P Jordan |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Rule 16(a) Initial Order Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 1/12/2023 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball. No later than seven (7) days prior to the TCMC, a confidential memorandum AND a proposed Case Management Order shall be submitted via e mail to ball_chambers@mssd.uscourts.gov. Counsel for Plaintiff shall set up the conference and, once all the parties are on the line, contact the Court at 601-608-4460. (JEJ) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lowe's (Robinson, Benjamin) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Lowe's.(Robinson, Benjamin) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Carolyn Ann Harris. Lowe's served on 10/14/2022, answer due 11/4/2022. (Blackmon, Edward) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Lowe's. (VM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Does I-V, Lowe's (Filing fee $402 receipt number 2132), filed by Carolyn Ann Harris. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(VM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
