Jackson v. USP-Yazoo City Warden
| Charles E. Jackson |
| USP-Yazoo City Warden |
| Pro Se Department |
| 3:2022cv00655 |
| November 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| LaKeysha Greer Isaac |
| Carlton W Reeves |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
FINAL JUDGMENT - IT IS, HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this cause filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 is dismissed with prejudice as to the jurisdictional issue and without prejudice in all other respects. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 01/06/2023 (CO)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that pro se Petitioner Charles E. Jacksons Petition [ECF No. 1] for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 is dismissed with prejudice as to the jurisdictional issues and without prejudice in all other respects. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 01/06/2023 (CO)
|
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Charles E. Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CO) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 2443.), filed by Charles E. Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Copy of Indictment, #2 Exhibit B - Copy of Judgment, #3 Notice of Assignment, #4 Envelope)(CO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
