Decatur v. Cain
Robert Decatur |
Burl Cain |
Pro Se Department |
3:2022cv00679 |
November 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
LaKeysha Greer Isaac |
Carlton W Reeves |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed by Lynn Fitch as to Burl Cain served on 1/6/2023, answer due 1/26/2023. (VM) |
Filing 4 ORDER - ORDERED that the Respondent, through the Attorney General of the State ofMississippi, file an answer or other responsive pleading in this cause within twenty (20) days of the service upon the said Attorney General of a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge LaKeysha Greer Isaac on 1/4/2023 (VM) |
Filing 3 Response to Order re #2 ORDER -On or before December 28, 2022, Petitioner shall file a written response consistent with this Order, filed by Robert Decatur. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(VM) |
Filing 2 ORDER -On or before December 28, 2022, Petitioner shall file a written response consistent with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge LaKeysha Greer Isaac on 11/28/2022 (VM) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number 2556.), filed by Robert Decatur. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Assignment)(KNS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.