Lovern v. Dolgencorp, LLC et al
| Natasha Lovern |
| Dollar General Corporation, John Doe Entities A-M and Dolgencorp, LLC doing business as Dollar General |
| 3:2022cv00681 |
| November 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Tom S Lee |
| Robert P Myers |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Service of Request for Production by Natasha Lovern (Kilpatrick, Jay) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Service of Interrogatories by Natasha Lovern (Kilpatrick, Jay) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting [] Motion to Substitute Party. Dolgencorp, LLC d/b/a Dollar General added. Dollar General Corporation terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr on 22-681 (LAT)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Service of Request for Production by Dollar General Corporation (Brady, John) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Service of Interrogatories by Dollar General Corporation (Brady, John) |
| ORE TENUS AGREED MOTION to Substitute Party. By agreement of the parties, Dolgencorp, LLC, d/b/a Dollar General, be substituted as the proper party defendant in this case in place of Dollar General Corporation. (SR) |
|
Filing 7
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Jury Trial set during a four-week term of Court beginning on 2/5/2024 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4A (Jackson) before District Judge Tom S. Lee. Pretrial Conference set for 1/16/2024 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4A (Jackson) before District Judge Tom S. Lee. Discovery due by 9/1/2023. Motions for Amended Pleadings due by 2/9/2023. Motions for Joinder of Parties due by 2/9/2023. Designate Experts Plaintiff Deadline due by 6/1/2023. Designate Experts for Defendant Deadline due by 7/3/2023. Motions due by 9/15/2023. Settlement Conference set for 11/15/2023 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6B (Jackson) Visiting before Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers Jr. ADR Report due by 1/9/2024. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 1/16/2024. EDT: 3 days. Parties do not consent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr on 1/9/2023 (SR)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr: Telephonic Case Management Conference held on 1/9/2023 with attorneys Jay Max Kilpatrick and John D. Brady. (SR) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Service of Initial Disclosure by Natasha Lovern (Kilpatrick, Jay) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Service of Disclosure by Dollar General Corporation (Brady, John) |
| Filing 4 State Court Record by Defendant Dollar General Corporation (Brady, John) |
| Filing 3 Rule 16(a) Initial Order Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 1/9/2023 09:15 AM before Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers Jr. (SR) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Dollar General Corporation.(Brady, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Dollar General Corporation from Neshoba County Circuit Court, case number 22-cv-392-NS-MI. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMSSDC-4990351) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(LAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
