Yarbrough v. Lauderdale County Circuit Court
Charles Ray Yarbrough |
Lauderdale County Circuit Court |
Pro Se Department |
3:2022cv00720 |
December 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
F Keith Ball |
Daniel P Jordan |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus re #3 ORDER, filed by Charles Ray Yarbrough. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(KNS) |
Filing 3 ORDER - ORDERED that the Court will construe this civil action as a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to edit the docket to reflect that this civil action is a habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner Charles Ray Yarbrough within 30 days of the entry of this Order must complete, sign under penalty of perjury, and file the enclosed Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 form. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 1/3/2023 (Attachments: #1 Attachment Form AO-241)(ND) |
Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Charles Yarbrough. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CO) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lauderdale County Circuit Court, filed by Charles Yarbrough. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Assignment, #2 Envelope)(CO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.