Randle v. Magnolia Senior Care, LLC
| Lamar Randle |
| Magnolia Senior Care, LLC |
| 3:2022cv00724 |
| December 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| F Keith Ball |
| Carlton W Reeves |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Rule 16(a) Initial Order Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 3/14/2023 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball. No later than seven (7) days prior to the TCMC, a confidential memorandum AND a proposed Case Management Order shall be submitted via e mail to ball_chambers@mssd.uscourts.gov. Counsel for Plaintiff shall set up the conference and, once all the parties are on the line, contact the Court at 601-608-4460. (JEJ) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) filed by Magnolia Senior Care, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Charge of Discrimination, #3 Exhibit Plaintiff's Right to Sue Letter)(Eaton, David) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) by Magnolia Senior Care, LLC (Eaton, David) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Magnolia Senior Care, LLC.(Eaton, David) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Cynthia G. Denley on behalf of Magnolia Senior Care, LLC (Denley, Cynthia) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Magnolia Senior Care, LLC (Eaton, David) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Eaton on behalf of Magnolia Senior Care, LLC (Eaton, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Magnolia Senior Care, LLC from Circuit Court of Hinds County, Mississippi, case number 22-538. (Filing fee $402 receipt number BMSSDC-5005790) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Service Documents, #2 Exhibit 2 Complaint, #3 Exhibit 3 Certified Copy of State Court File, #4 Exhibit 4 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal in Circuit Court, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(VM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Randle v. Magnolia Senior Care, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lamar Randle | |
| Represented By: | Rodgrick G. Hickman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Magnolia Senior Care, LLC | |
| Represented By: | David M. Eaton |
| Represented By: | Cynthia G. Denley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
