Atkinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Bennie Atkinson |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA General Counsel and General Counsel SSA-Office of the General Counsel |
| 3:2022cv00730 |
| December 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Daniel P Jordan |
| Bradley W Rath |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER Regarding Answer and Briefing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 12/20/2022 (TS)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Angela Givens Williams-Federal Gov on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Williams-Federal Gov, Angela) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 2823), filed by Bennie Atkinson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(LAT) |
| Filing 1 Notice: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case.No summons shall issue. Answer due by 2/17/2023. (LAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
