The Mississippi Bar v. Hammett
| The Mississippi Bar |
| Mary Holly Hammett |
| Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and Katherine Alexander |
| 3:2023ad00001 |
| January 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Daniel P Jordan |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER of Suspension as to Mary Holly Hammett. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 02/06/2023 (KHA)
|
| Filing 5 Sealed Document RE: #4 Response to Order filed by Mary Holly Hammett (KHA) |
| Filing 4 Response to Order re #2 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to Mary Holly Hammett. Show Cause Response due by 2/6/2023. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 1/5/2023 (PG) filed by Mary Holly Hammett (KHA) |
| Filing 3 Mail Returned as Undeliverable as to #2 Order To Show Cause. Mail sent to Mary Holly Hammett. (PG) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to Mary Holly Hammett. Show Cause Response due by 2/6/2023. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 1/5/2023 (PG)
|
| Filing 1 OPINION AND JUDGMENT as to the Suspension of Mary Holly Hammett by the Supreme Court of Mississippi, dated 12/28/2022, Cause No. 2022-B-00728 and filed on 12/29/2022. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(PG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
