Patterson v. United States of America
David Patterson |
United States of America |
Pro Se Department |
3:2023cv00003 |
January 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
F Keith Ball |
Daniel P Jordan |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Letter from plaintiff. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (cwl) |
Filing 4 ORDER: The Clerk is directed to mail to prisoner plaintiff a copy of notice of new law (PSP-1); Acknowledgment of Receipt and Certification (PSP-3); and form for voluntary dismissal (PSP-4). Plaintiff is directed to sign either the Acknowledgment (PSP-3) or Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (PSP-4) and return to Clerk within 30 days of the date of this order or case may be dismissed without prejudice. Order with packet of forms mailed. Prisoner Petition Pleadings due by 2/27/2023 Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 1/26/2023 (PG) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by David Patterson (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Envelope)(cwl) |
Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Patterson (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cwl) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America, filed by David Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Notice of Assignment)(cwl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.