Johnson Milling Company LLC v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company et al
Plaintiff: Johnson Milling Company LLC
Defendant: The Kansas City Southern Railway Company and Doe Defendants 1-10
Case Number: 3:2023cv00087
Filed: February 1, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: F Keith Ball
Referring Judge: Daniel P Jordan
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2023 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #5 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Dennis Jason Childress terminated. No further written order shall issue from the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 3/10/2023 (MAM)
March 9, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (Childress, Dennis)
February 2, 2023 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Kansas City Southern Railway Company identifying Corporate Parent Canadian Pacific Railway Limited for The Kansas City Southern Railway Company. (Childress, Dennis)
February 2, 2023 Filing 3 State Court Record by Defendant The Kansas City Southern Railway Company Volumes 1 (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(Childress, Dennis)
February 2, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles E. Ross on behalf of The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (Ross, Charles)
February 1, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The Kansas City Southern Railway Company from Circuit Court of Hinds County, Mississippi, case number 22-27. (Filing fee $402 receipt number AMSSDC-5036964) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Complaint, #2 Exhibit B Ps Resp to Ints & RPDs, #3 Exhibit C Ps Supp Resp to Ints & RPDs, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D MS Sec of State Info KCSR, #5 Exhibit E Hinds County Landroll, #6 Exhibit F Service of Process Transmittal Sheet, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(VM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson Milling Company LLC v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Johnson Milling Company LLC
Represented By: Thomas J. Bellinder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Represented By: Dennis Jason Childress
Represented By: Charles E. Ross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe Defendants 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?