Johnson Milling Company LLC v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company et al
| Johnson Milling Company LLC |
| The Kansas City Southern Railway Company and Doe Defendants 1-10 |
| 3:2023cv00087 |
| February 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| F Keith Ball |
| Daniel P Jordan |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The Kansas City Southern Railway Company from Circuit Court of Hinds County, Mississippi, case number 22-27. (Filing fee $402 receipt number AMSSDC-5036964) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Complaint, #2 Exhibit B Ps Resp to Ints & RPDs, #3 Exhibit C Ps Supp Resp to Ints & RPDs, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D MS Sec of State Info KCSR, #5 Exhibit E Hinds County Landroll, #6 Exhibit F Service of Process Transmittal Sheet, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(VM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
