Koestler v. Denbury Gulf Coast Pipelines, LLC et al
Korinne Heying Koestler |
Denbury Gulf Coast Pipelines, LLC and John and Jane Does I-X |
3:2023cv00133 |
February 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Tom S Lee |
Michael T Parker |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 5/16/2023 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker. Counsel shall dial 888.273.3658, code 1055457 to connect to the call. Confidential settlement memoranda are due on or before 5/9/23. (KPM) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kyle V. Miller on behalf of Denbury Gulf Coast Pipelines, LLC (Miller, Kyle) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Denbury Gulf Coast Pipelines, LLC.(Smith, Margaret) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Korinne Heying Koestler. Denbury Gulf Coast Pipelines, LLC served on 3/14/2023, answer due 4/4/2023. (Hawkins, John) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Denbury Gulf Coast Pipelines, LLC. (cwl) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Denbury Gulf Coast Pipelines, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMSSDC-5051087), filed by Korinne Heying Koestler. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cwl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.