Lott v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Luevrin Lott
Defendant: Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party: General Counsel SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Case Number: 3:2023cv00141
Filed: February 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Bradley W Rath
Referring Judge: Henry T Wingate
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. That Attorney Jennifer L. Dunn be admitted pro hac vice in this case on behalf of Plaintiff Luevrin Lott in association with local counsel conditioned upon completion of the registration procedures found on the Court's website and at the following link: https://www.mssd.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions-page. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE FROM THE COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 2/28/2023 (AB)
February 27, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION for Jennifer L. Dunn to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number AMSSDC-5055604) by Luevrin Lott (Hussey, Curtis)
February 27, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Angela Givens Williams-Federal Gov on behalf of Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration (Williams-Federal Gov, Angela)
February 27, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMSSDC-5055057), filed by Luevrin Lott. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(LAT)
February 27, 2023 Notice: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case.No summons shall issue. Answer due by 4/28/2023. (LAT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lott v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Luevrin Lott
Represented By: Curtis Ray Hussey
Represented By: Jennifer L. Dunn - PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Angela Givens Williams-Federal Gov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: General Counsel SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?