Foster v. Sawyer et al
| David Foster |
| J&L Trucking, LLC, Thomas Sawyer, J&L Trucking of NC LLC, John Doe(s) 1-5 and John Doe Entity(ies) 1-5 |
| 3:2023cv00187 |
| March 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Kristi H Johnson |
| Michael T Parker |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Service of Request for Production by J&L Trucking, LLC, Thomas Sawyer (Penn, Ethan) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Service of Interrogatories by J&L Trucking, LLC, Thomas Sawyer (Penn, Ethan) |
| Filing 4 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 5/22/2023 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker. Counsel shall dial 888.273.3658, code 1055457 to connect to the call. Confidential settlement memoranda are due on or before 5/15/23. (KPM) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by J&L Trucking, LLC, Thomas Sawyer.(Penn, Ethan) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to J&L Trucking, LLC, Thomas Sawyer. (VM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Thomas Sawyer, J&L Trucking, LLC, John Doe(s) 1-5, John Doe Entity(ies) 1-5 (Filing fee $402 receipt number 3736), filed by David Foster. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(VM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
