Irvine v. McCarthy
| Darren Irvine |
| Major Unknown McCarthy |
| Pro Se Department |
| 3:2023cv00220 |
| March 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Kristi H Johnson |
| Michael T Parker |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER SEVERING HABEAS CLAIMS- IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Irvines habeas claims are SEVERED from this 1983 civil action. The Clerk of Court shall open a new civil action under 28 U.S.C. 2241 in the Northern Division based on Irvines criminal charges in Lauderdale County, Mississippi, with Major Unknown McCarthy as the Respondent, and therein file a copy of Irvines Complaint #1 as his initiating Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, along with a copy of Irvines Motion #2 for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, and a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 3/31/2023 (LAT)
|
| Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Darren Irvine. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LAT) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Darren Irvine. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Envelope, #3 Notice of Assignment)(LAT) (Attachment 3 replaced on 3/31/2023) (LAT). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
