Johnson et al v. Jenkins et al
| Johnny Johnson and Beth Ann Johnson |
| Donald A. Jenkins and Travelers Personal Insurance Company |
| 3:2023cv00526 |
| August 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Kristi H Johnson |
| Michael T Parker |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 10/23/2023 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker. Counsel shall dial 888.273.3658, code 1055457 to connect to the call. Confidential settlement memoranda are due on or before 10/16/23. (KPM)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Dismiss, and Plaintiffs claims against Donald A. Jenkins are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Kristi H. Johnson on 9/7/2023 (PG)
|
|
Filing 8
RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Donald A. Jenkins filed by Johnny Johnson (Shannon, James)
|
|
Filing 7
RESPONSE to Motion re #1 Notice of Removal filed by Johnny Johnson (Shannon, James) Modified on 9/6/2023 (LAT).
|
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER - Plaintiff's response to Defendants' #4 Motion to Dismiss Defendant Donald A. Jenkins was due 9/1/2023. The Court orders the Plaintiff to either file a response or confess that the motion should be granted no later than 9/8/2023. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER TO FOLLOW. Signed by District Judge Kristi H. Johnson on 9/5/2023. (KLB)
|
|
Filing 6
State Court Record by Defendant Travelers Personal Insurance Company (Russell, Dale)
|
|
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #s [3,4,5]: Incorrect division listed. Attorney is advised to use Northern division name in future filings. (KNS)
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Donald A. Jenkins filed by Donald A. Jenkins (Smith, Blake)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Donald A. Jenkins by Donald A. Jenkins (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Homeowners Policy Declarations, #2 Exhibit 2 - Denial Letter 4.25.22, #3 Exhibit 3 - Hill Engineering Report, #4 Exhibit 4 - Denial Letter 5.16.22, #5 Exhibit 5 - Complaint)(Smith, Blake)
|
|
Filing 3
ANSWER to Complaint by Travelers Personal Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - 4.25.22 Correspondence, #2 Exhibit 2 - Hill Engineering Report, #3 Exhibit 3 - Policy)(Smith, Blake)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Blake D. Smith on behalf of Travelers Personal Insurance Company (Smith, Blake)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Travelers Personal Insurance Company from Circuit Court Copiah County, Mississippi, case number 15CI1:23-cv-288-THI. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMSSDC-5184800) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Policy, #2 Exhibit 2 - 042522 Denial Letter, #3 Exhibit 3 - Hill Report, #4 Exhibit 4 - 051622 Denial Letter, #5 Exhibit 5 - Complaint, #6 Exhibit 6 - CSC Service, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(CO)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
