Varnado v. Huffman
| Cutrell Varnado and Cutrell Smith Varnado |
| Brand Huffman |
| Pro Se Department |
| 3:2023cv03014 |
| October 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Kristi H Johnson |
| Bradley W Rath |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis re #3 by Cutrell Varnado. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CO) |
Filing 3
ORDER: on or before 11/22/2023, plaintiff shall either pay the required $5.00 filing fee or file a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, specifically the section entitled Certificate to Be Completed by Authorized Officer of prisoner accounts or file an affidavit specifically stating the name of the prison official contacted concerning the Certificate and why this information is not provided to this court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 10/23/2023 (KNS)
|
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Cutrell Varnado. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(KNS) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Cutrell Varnado. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope, #3 Notice of Assignment)(KNS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
