Leflore-Davis v. Protective Insurance et al
Latunja Leflore-Davis |
Protective Insurance and John Does 1-10 |
3:2023cv03077 |
November 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Tom S Lee |
Michael T Parker |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 2/5/2024 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker. Counsel shall dial 888.273.3658, code 1055457 to connect to the call. Confidential settlement memoranda are due on or before 1/29/24. (KPM) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Protective Insurance.(Manor, Wade) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Wade G. Manor on behalf of Protective Insurance (Manor, Wade) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #4 : Attorney is advised to include the correct judge assignment TSL-MTP on future filed pleadings. (KNS) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Latunja Leflore-Davis. Protective Insurance served on 11/17/2023, answer due 12/8/2023. (Blackmon, Edward) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Protective Insurance. (VM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Protective Insurance (Filing fee $402 receipt number 6414), filed by Latunja Leflore-Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Civil Cover Sheet)(VM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.