Hawkins v. State of Panola County et al
Aron Hawkins, Jr. |
State of Panola County and Karnasha Thomas |
Pro Se Department |
3:2024cv00052 |
January 29, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Kristi H Johnson |
Michael T Parker |
Mandamus & Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Acknowledgment of Receipt of Prisoner Litigation Reform Act and Amendments to MCA 47-5-138 as to #3 Order Opsp2, filed by Aron Hawkins, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(ND) |
Filing 3 ORDER: The Clerk is directed to mail to prisoner plaintiff a copy of notice of new law (PSP-1); Acknowledgment of Receipt and Certification (PSP-3); and form for voluntary dismissal (PSP-4). Plaintiff is directed to sign either the Acknowledgment (PSP-3) or Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (PSP-4) and return to Clerk within 30 days of the date of this order or case may be dismissed without prejudice. Order with packet of forms mailed. Prisoner Petition Pleadings due by 2/29/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 1/30/2024 (ND) |
Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Aron Hawkins, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ND) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State of Panola County and Karnasha Thomas, filed by Aron Hawkins, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Notice of Assignment)(ND) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.