Wells v. TK Elevator Corporation, et al
Plaintiff: Rosalyn Wells
Defendant: TK Elevator Corporation, Otis Elevator Company and John and Jane Does 1-10
Case Number: 3:2024cv00072
Filed: February 7, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Tom S Lee
Referring Judge: Michael T Parker
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2024 Filing 4 Subpoena Returned Executed as to St Dominic Hospital. (Smith, Roy)
March 13, 2024 Filing 3 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 4/19/2024 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker. Counsel shall dial 888.273.3658, code 1055457 to connect to the call. Confidential settlement memoranda are due on or before 4/12/24. (KPM)
February 13, 2024 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Otis Elevator Company (Smith, Roy)
February 7, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Otis Elevator Company from The Circuit Court of Hinds County, MS, case number 25CI1:23-cv-633-WLK. ( Filing fee $ 405 paid; receipt number AMSSDC-5330954 ) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Case, #3 Exhibit C - Otis 2023 Corporate Annual Report, #4 Exhibit D - TK Elevator 2023 Corporate Annual Report, #5 Exhibit E - Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of St. Dominics, #6 Exhibit F - TKE Consent to Removal, #7 Exhibit G - Wells Responses to Requests for Admissions, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(ND)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wells v. TK Elevator Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rosalyn Wells
Represented By: Marshall J. Goff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TK Elevator Corporation
Represented By: John Kearney Nieset
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Otis Elevator Company
Represented By: Roy A. Smith, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John and Jane Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?