Porter et al v. Rankin County, Mississippi et al
| Michael Anthony Porter and Marvin Porter |
| Rankin County, Mississippi, Bryan Bailey, Brett McAlpin, Jeffrey Middleton and Unknown Officers 1-10 |
| 3:2024cv00085 |
| February 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| F Keith Ball |
| Andrew S Harris |
| Carlton W Reeves |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Marvin Porter, Michael Anthony Porter (Haycock, Trentan) |
| Remark: Civil Case Terminated pursuant to the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed on 4/4/2024. (cwl) |
Filing 2
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Andrew S. Harris for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball no longer assigned to case Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 3/1/24 (MGB)
|
| Remark: Parties should include the newly assigned Magistrate Judge's initials ASH on future filings. (MGB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bryan Bailey, Brett McAlpin, Jeffrey Middleton, Rankin County, Mississippi, Unknown Officers 1-10 ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMSSDC-5333182), filed by Michael Anthony Porter, Marvin Porter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KNS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
