Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota v. Pacific Bay Investments, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota
Defendant: Pacific Bay Investments, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2024cv00104
Filed: February 20, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: F Keith Ball
Referring Judge: Andrew S Harris
2 Judge: Carlton W Reeves
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2024 Filing 10 Rule 16(a) Initial Order Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 6/7/2024 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Andrew S. Harris. No later than seven (7) days prior to the TCMC, a confidential memorandum AND a proposed Case Management Order shall be submitted via e mail to harris_chambers@mssd.uscourts.gov. Counsel for Plaintiff shall set up the conference and, once all the parties are on the line, contact the Court at 601-608-4460. (JEJ)
April 1, 2024 Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Counterclaim of Pacific Bay Investments by Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota (McMackin, John)
April 1, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by John Patrick McMackin on behalf of Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota (McMackin, John)
April 1, 2024 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Counterclaim of Pacific Bay Investments. Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota answer due 4/25/2024. No further written order shall issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew S. Harris on April 1, 2024. (DI)
March 22, 2024 DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #7 : The case style should include the complete case number and correct judge assignment on future filed pleadings. This case was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Andrew S. Harris on March 1, 2024. (VM)
March 21, 2024 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,, with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota by Pacific Bay Investments, Inc..(Cory, Michael)
March 15, 2024 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. That Attorney Benjamin D. Doyle be admitted pro hac vice in this case on behalf of Defendant in association with local counsel conditioned upon completion of the registration procedures found on the Courts website and at the following link: https://www.mssd.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions-page. No further written order shall issue from the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew S. Harris on 3/15/2024. (JEJ)
March 12, 2024 Filing 6 MOTION for Benjamin D. Doyle to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Pacific Bay Investments, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Cory, Michael)
March 12, 2024 Pro Hac Vice fee paid for Benjamin D. Doyle receipt number AMSSDC-5358631 $ 100 (Cory, Michael)
March 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Andrew S. Harris for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball no longer assigned to case Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 3/1/2024 (WD)
March 1, 2024 Remark: Parties should include the newly assigned Magistrate Judge's initials ASH on future filings. (WD)
February 26, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Verdier Cory, Jr on behalf of Pacific Bay Investments, Inc. (Cory, Michael)
February 21, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Kyle Stuart Moran on behalf of Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota (Moran, Kyle)
February 21, 2024 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota (Holland, Drury)
February 20, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE against Pacific Bay Investments, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number BMSSDC-5339115), filed by Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Policy, #2 Exhibit B - Emails re vacancy and vandalism, #3 Exhibit C - Emails - Settlement Acceptance, #4 Exhibit D - Notification of Claim, #5 Exhibit E - Acknowledgment of Claim Letter, #6 Exhibit F - Email from Shauna Jones on 08.14.2023, #7 Exhibit G - Email about vacating premises, #8 Exhibit H - Malone Letters of Representation, #9 Exhibit I - ROR Letter, #10 Exhibit J - Emails - Malone Estimate, #11 Exhibit K - Response Email from Jason Malone 10.27.2023, #12 Exhibit L - Emails - Malone Release Request & Payee Info, #13 Exhibit M - Emails - Release Sent, #14 Exhibit N - Demand Letter, #15 Exhibit O - Confidential Settlement Release Indemnity and Hold Harmless Agreement, #16 Civil Cover Sheet)(CO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota v. Pacific Bay Investments, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota
Represented By: Drury Sumner Holland
Represented By: Kyle Stuart Moran
Represented By: John Patrick McMackin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pacific Bay Investments, Inc.
Represented By: Benjamin D. Doyle - PHV
Represented By: Michael Verdier Cory, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?