Romero-Bonilla v. Ping
| Jose J. Romero Ronilla and Jose J. Romero-Bonilla |
| Warden L. Ping |
| Pro Se Department |
| 3:2024cv00129 |
| March 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Andrew S Harris |
| Daniel P Jordan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER directing Petitioner to file a response re: ARP exhaustion by 5/10/24. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew S. Harris on 4/25/24. (AAO)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER *RESTRICTED* denying as moot #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis because Petitioner paid the $5 filing fee on 4/22/24. See Receipt No. 8126. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew S. Harris on 4/25/24. (AAO)
|
| Filing fee: $5, receipt number 8126. (VM) |
| Filing 3 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis re #2 ORDER by Jose J. Romero-Bonilla. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(PG) Modified on 4/8/2024 (KNS). |
|
Filing 2
ORDER. ORDERED: That on or before April 15, 2024, petitioner shall complete and file the attached application OR pay the $5.00 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew S. Harris on 3/15/2024 (PG)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jose J. Romero-Bonilla. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Notice of Assignment)(VM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
