Edwards v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
Angela Edwards |
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and John Does I-V |
3:2024cv00169 |
March 25, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Tom S Lee |
Michael T Parker |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 State Court Record by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Moss, Rajita) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Moss, Rajita) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP from Circuit Court of Lauderdale County, Mississippi, case number 38CI1:23-cv-70-cw. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMSSDC-5368153) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Other PaperItemization, #3 Exhibit C - Copies of process, pleadings served on Walmart, #4 Exhibit D - PL's Responses to RFA, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(CO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.