Harvey v. Loden
| Edward Robert Harvey |
| Chris Loden |
| Pro Se Department |
| 3:2024cv00196 |
| April 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Daniel P Jordan |
| Michael T Parker |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (PG) |
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Mississippi Northern; Case Number 3:24-cv-00078. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE Case Transferred to Southern District Mississippi. Transferred electronically via CM/ECF. CASE CLOSED. (tab) [Transferred from Mississippi Northern on 4/5/2024.]
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Debra M Brown and Magistrate Judge David Sanders. (tab) [Transferred from Mississippi Northern on 4/5/2024.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Edward Robert Harvey. (tab) [Transferred from Mississippi Northern on 4/5/2024.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Rankin County) filed by Edward Robert Harvey. (Attachments: #1 MS Supreme Court Brief of Appellee, #2 Certificate of Interested Persons) (tab) Modified on 4/4/2024 (jla). [Transferred from Mississippi Northern on 4/5/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
